Loading...

Why Almost Nobody Wants to Pay for Tesla's Full Self-Driving Tech

Why Almost Nobody Wants to Pay for Tesla's Full Self-Driving Tech
The Sizzle Without the Steak: Tesla's Full Self-Driving Conundrum

In a move that had the automotive world abuzz, Tesla lowered the price of its much-touted “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) technology and dangled a one-month free trial in front of its users. Yet, in a turn of events that has left industry onlookers scratching their heads, the grand gesture has fizzled rather spectacularly. According to InsideEVs, citing data from YipitData and Moomoo Technologies, the uptake from free trial to paid subscription is astonishingly low, with only 2% of nearly 3,500 Tesla owners taking the bait.

What gives? The technology, despite its grandiose name, is categorized as an SAE Level 2 driving system, which in layman’s terms means it's not quite the autonomous marvel Elon Musk's hyperbolic pitches have led many to believe. The apparent mismatch between expectation and reality could be a significant factor deterring owners from parting with $8,000 or committing to a $99 monthly fee. Adding to the skepticism are lingering questions surrounding the technology's efficacy in real-life driving scenarios.

Tesla, a titan in the electric vehicle arena with its best-selling lineup, has stumbled in its deployment of FSD, plagued by slow rollouts and functionality queries. The saga took another turn recently as Tesla transitioned its 'beta' version to a so-called 'Supervised' model, now at version 12.3. Despite the adjustments, the essential requirement of an alert driver behind the wheel remains, emphasizing that the tech is more of an advanced driver-assistance system than a true self-driving solution.

The story doesn’t end there. Tesla's Autopilot system, another component of its advanced driving ecosystem, has come under tightening regulatory scrutiny. Following a slew of incidents, the automaker was compelled to recall all its vehicles, addressing flaws in how its cars monitor driver attention and manage control. Post-recall, at least 20 crashes have been reported, underscoring ongoing safety concerns.

Further complicating matters, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has raised eyebrows, demanding detailed information on Tesla's Autopilot usage, including data on warnings issued to drivers to keep their hands on the wheel. This scrutiny paints a picture of a technology still very much in trial, both in the court of public opinion and within regulatory frameworks.

In essence, Tesla's Full Self-Driving saga is a cautionary tale of innovation outpacing assurance. For potential customers, the leap from free trial to financial commitment is a chasm too wide, marred by unmet expectations and unresolved regulatory hurdles. As the dust settles, the industry watches keenly, hoping for a resolution that bridges innovation with safety, without compromising the thrill that Tesla promises.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology is categorized as an SAE Level 2 driving system, which means it is not a fully autonomous driving solution.

Only 2% of nearly 3,500 Tesla owners took up the paid subscription after the free trial of Full Self-Driving (FSD).

The mismatch between the expectations set by Elon Musk's pitches and the actual capabilities of the technology is a significant factor deterring owners from purchasing Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology.

Tesla transitioned its 'beta' version of Full Self-Driving (FSD) to a 'Supervised' model, now at version 12.3, emphasizing the need for an alert driver behind the wheel.

Tesla's Autopilot system has come under regulatory scrutiny due to incidents that compelled the automaker to recall all its vehicles to address flaws in monitoring driver attention and control management.
Share:
Top